Online Secure Trust Application

Real‑World Litigation Examples

Litigation risk is real. In the U.S., state courts process tens of millions of cases each year, and the economic cost of tort litigation is routinely estimated in the hundreds of billions of dollars annually. Even when a claim lacks merit, the time, distraction, and defense expense can be significant.

The goal of asset protection is not to “hide” assets or evade taxes. The goal is to reduce avoidable exposure through lawful structures, clear documentation, and disciplined administration—so one event does not jeopardize your entire balance sheet.

What these examples demonstrate:

• Small disputes can escalate into expensive legal conflicts.
• Media narratives can oversimplify facts—good planning focuses on realities, not headlines.
• Risk is managed with structure, insurance, and documentation—not wishful thinking.

Note: These examples are educational. They are not legal advice.

Pearson v. Chung (“The Dry Cleaners” Case)

A customer dispute over a pair of pants turned into a high-profile lawsuit seeking tens of millions of dollars from a small family-owned dry cleaner. The court ultimately ruled for the dry cleaner. The case became widely cited as an example of how litigation can be used aggressively, even in ordinary consumer situations.

Practical lessons:

• Defense costs drive outcomes: Many defendants settle to avoid the cost and uncertainty of litigation—even when they believe they are right.
• Documentation matters: Clear records, receipts, and consistent procedures reduce ambiguity and strengthen your position.
• Structure limits blast radius: Proper separation between business operations and personal assets reduces what a claimant can realistically pursue.

Liebeck v. McDonald’s (“Hot Coffee” Case)

This case is often repeated as a “frivolous lawsuit” story. The facts are more specific: the plaintiff suffered serious burns, a jury awarded compensatory and punitive damages, and the final amounts were later reduced and ultimately resolved confidentially. The broader point is straightforward: when injuries are severe and evidence supports negligence, liability can become expensive.

Practical lessons:

• Real injuries create real exposure: When harm is documented, damages can be substantial—especially if punitive factors are argued.
• Insurance is not optional: Adequate coverage (general liability, umbrella, professional liability where relevant) is a baseline.
• Operational controls reduce claims: Training, warnings, procedures, and quality controls prevent incidents and support defensibility.

What Asset Protection Actually Means

Asset protection is proactive risk management. It is the disciplined process of structuring ownership and administration so that liabilities are contained and legitimate planning goals are achieved. Done correctly, it works alongside insurance and compliance—not against them.

Core methods used in legitimate planning:

• Separate liabilities: Distinguish personal assets from operating risk using appropriate entities and governance.
• Use trusts for continuity and administration: Trusts can support estate planning, structured ownership, and consistent management when properly drafted and administered.
• Strengthen contracts and records: Clean documentation (minutes, invoices, agreements, policies) reduces “alter‑ego” and commingling risks.
• Optimize insurance: Align coverage limits with real exposure (business activities, real estate, professional services).
• Plan early: Effective planning is implemented before disputes arise. Timing matters.

Ultimately, you cannot eliminate risk without disconnecting from the world. You can, however, reduce exposure and control outcomes by implementing lawful, well-documented structures.

Start Your Confidential Assessment

Complete the secure intake below to help us understand your objectives, jurisdiction, and risk profile. We will respond with next steps and clarify what is realistic, what is limited by law, and what documentation is required.